data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86623/866234633022dcdfde1115dac103a428faa4bbda" alt="Parasitoid wasp “photobombing” my attempt of taking a close-up photo of an Acrida ungarica mediterranea"
In this post, I am going to tear apart my self-imposed 1-page and useful-topic-rules once forever; it clearly cannot work in my blog. I am going to discuss photography, but I am not a professional photographer and you should not buy what I am going to say too easily. The way I am going to talk about it is arguably helpful. This is, by all means, a J’accuse.
If you are here, you probably noticed the photos of my website already. Before being as it is now, the photos belonged to a sub-page of a half-page essay on photography, which is pretty much what you are going to read here. Whoever knows me is aware that I can have extremely strong opinions on certain matters. Sometimes I exceed, and I realise it (give me time). In the first moment, I decided that my short essay was better as a sub-page of the photos page. In a second moment, I decided that it was better to remove it altogether and turn it into a blog post. So if you are reading it, it means that you looked for it, hence now it’s your responsibility only and my conscience is clear.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87599/875996499067f167882014e4e590266e253e0732" alt=""
Whatever you may think of my photos, I am not a good photographer. I got my first camera when I was 12 years old (great present!), one that was still working on films. I always liked museums, animals, plants, rocks, and landscapes. Photographing people has never crossed my mind. During my BSc, I became interested in taxonomy and I needed some sort of records because I have never been too keen on collecting animals. I was lucky that my favourite groups were butterflies and moths, and that I could identify most of them from photos. A close friend of mine who was captivated by beetles wasn’t equally lucky. For being able to name an insect, I needed a clear photo of the species showing the important morphological characters for its identification. I was not looking for the dynamic, special colours, composition, and other elements that are essential to be a good photographer. Photography was just a tool for being a better entomologist; I sought realistic photos.
While the Advent of Photoshop was blessed by most amateur photographers, I repulsed it. The postproduction I do on my photos does not go over cropping and straightening the horizon when I messed it up; that’s it. Even some of my friends were telling me that I exaggerated (I told you) and that the program allows you to get closer to reality, as a photo is never identical to what your eyes were seeing. Postproduction could make it closer to what it was, they say. I kept being suspicious because everywhere around me I saw photos that were more and more different from the original object, not closer. Colours, light, sharpness, contrast were changed and I was not even sure about the veracity of the elements (in two books I read, professional photographers suggest to crop elements from one photo and paste it into another). For me it was shocking.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78f68/78f68504522af320bbfc4f7aae664a8f999b0421" alt=""
Repetita iuvant; I am not a professional photographer. I don’t sell my photos for a living and I have to luxury to be picky enough when it comes to doing whatever I want with my photos. I believe that modern photography is becoming excessively dependent on editing. Photographers no longer search for a photo; they make a photo. And everybody decides where to set her technical limits. One person will correct only minor defects, a second person will alter most of the colours, and a third person will crop and paste an object from another photo. But then, if everything is acceptable when editing, where does it stop? Can I make a good photo just sitting in front of my computer without using the camera?
I decided to keep doing with my photos exactly what I was doing: nothing. Photography is a matter of lifestyle for me. I need to spend an afternoon in the park trying to make a close-up of an Acrida hungarica mediterranea staring at me. When I realised that a wasp was crossing in one of the photos (photobombing!) it amazed me. I want to go on the seashore when it’s so cold that the Baltic is frozen and The Little Mermaid is surrounded by ice and not by water (and by tourists). I enjoy following the traces of an Arabian horned viper (Cerastes gasperettii) on the sand until luckily I find her and I can put my macro lens and shot a close-up (not that close-up). And it excites me when I realise that a Bedouin is walking his camels on the seashore in Sinai, and I must run to take my camera because I see the photo I want in my mind already. I don’t need editing for any of these things. I have to be outdoor, being patient, practicing the use of the camera settings, and of course, I need a bit of luck too.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00032/0003291630c27a5c9e7bc0d502d629fc7c934805" alt=""
Comments